Primary entity: Peptide Tutorials · Related: Editorial policy · How we evaluate evidence · Corrections · Disclaimers
Peptide Tutorials is an independent educational website about peptide literacy. Pages are written by Peptide Tutorials Staff, a group of independent researchers and writers — not doctors, pharmacists, nurses, or any other licensed clinicians — and the site has no clinical or medical reviewer. Accountability sits with the publication: email hello@peptidetutorials.com, read the editorial policy, and use the corrections log. We say that up front because this is health-adjacent content, and you should weigh it accordingly.
Key takeaways
- Editorial team: Peptide Tutorials Staff, a group of independent researchers and writers. Not clinicians.
- Accountability: the publication itself — contact (hello@peptidetutorials.com), the editorial policy, and the corrections log.
- No clinical reviewer — yet. Nobody with a medical or pharmacy license checks these pages before they go up. If that changes, we will name the person and list which pages they reviewed.
- No vendor money. We don't sell peptides, run affiliate links, or take payment from sellers, pharmacies, or clinics. See the editorial policy.
- Primary sources first. FDA labels and notices, the WADA list, and peer-reviewed papers outrank everything else — and every correction is logged.
- Not medical advice. Read the disclaimers; talk to a licensed clinician about your own health.
Questions this page answers
- Who writes Peptide Tutorials?
- Is there a doctor or clinical reviewer?
- Who pays for this site?
- What does the site cover — and refuse to cover?
- How can I check or challenge what's written here?
Who writes Peptide Tutorials?
Pages on this site are bylined Peptide Tutorials Staff — a group of independent researchers and writers, not clinicians. They are not a clinic, and nothing here should be read as clinical expertise. The site currently has no clinical or medical reviewer.
What the editorial team does: reads the primary documents (FDA labels and notices, regulatory pages, peer-reviewed papers, WADA documents), explains them in plain language, separates what is shown in cells or animals from what is shown in people, and says when the evidence is thin or missing. Drafts are prepared with AI assistance and then edited and checked against sources — see how we use AI.
Is there a doctor or clinical reviewer?
No. Peptide Tutorials currently has no physician, pharmacist, or other clinical reviewer. Pages are not "medically reviewed," and we removed every such label rather than leave one that isn't true.
What that means for you:
- Treat every page as a literacy aid written by careful non-clinicians, not as vetted clinical guidance.
- Where a page makes a regulatory or label claim, it links the primary source and shows when we last checked it. Check the source yourself before relying on it.
- Personal questions — whether a drug is right for you, what a safe dose is, how it interacts with your medicines — belong with a licensed clinician and a pharmacist.
- Higher-risk pages (for example anything about weight-loss drugs) are held back from search indexing until their citations are complete.
If a qualified clinician wants to review specific pages, that is welcome; reviewers would be named with their credentials and the exact pages covered, and contact is here.
Who pays for this site?
Nobody in the peptide business. The site doesn't sell peptides, diluents, syringes, or supplements; it doesn't carry affiliate links, discount codes, or "preferred vendor" lists; and it doesn't accept sponsored posts or payment for coverage, rankings, or evidence wording. If that ever changes, it will be disclosed on this page and on every affected page. Details: editorial policy.
What the site covers — and refuses to cover
- Covers: what peptides are, lab vocabulary, regulatory status, evidence summaries, comparisons, and the difference between peptides and look-alike compounds that are not peptides.
- Refuses: dosing protocols, cycle plans, blend recipes, where-to-buy advice, and anything that reads like a prescription. When we decline, the page says why and explains what the underlying question is.
How can I check or challenge what's written here?
- Read the editorial policy (sourcing hierarchy, update cadence, AI use) and the evidence ladder.
- Click the cited primary sources on any page.
- Found a mistake? Use Corrections — fixes are logged publicly with a date.
- Anything else: email hello@peptidetutorials.com or use Contact.
Frequently asked questions
Is Peptide Tutorials a company or a clinic?
No. It is an independent publishing project. It is not a clinic, pharmacy, laboratory, or store, and it does not provide medical services.
Why does it say "independent researchers" instead of listing credentials?
Because the editorial team has no clinical credentials to list. Pretending otherwise would be misleading on a health topic.
Will you add a medical reviewer?
Possibly. If one is added, the site will say who, with credentials, and which pages they actually reviewed. Until then, no page carries a "medically reviewed" label.
Can I trust the regulatory statements?
They are snapshots, each tied to a primary source and a "last checked" date where we've verified one. Regulators move quickly on peptides; always confirm on the linked fda.gov or federalregister.gov page.
Sources
- Peptide Tutorials. Editorial policy; How we evaluate evidence; Corrections; Disclaimers; Contact.
Educational content only — not medical advice. We do not sell peptides.